The Labour Party has seen some interesting twists and turns with policy over the past few years. Regional Assemblies being one example where we have had to change our viewpoint due to circumstances, but one area where Labour is in danger of not coming out smelling of roses is the issue of the Alternative Vote.
Earlier this year, whilst we were still in government,
we put forward a proposal for AV in the House of Commons and it was passed. Since then of course, there has been a change of government
and the Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition has put forward their own proposal of AV. This has been dismissed by many in the Labour Party and with some good reasons.
One concern is that AV is an important reason for the LIberal Democrats being involved in government and it is not in Labour's interests to support the coalition given that we are the main opposition, and that would be seen by the electorate as petty, but there is a second much more deeper reason that goes beyond party politics and touches at the fabric of our Democratic process.
The Conservatives agree to AV but have put forward the dictat that there is to be a reduction of Parliamentary seats and a redistribution of the boundaries of those said seats. That send s one unpleasant message to the other political parties and that is "we plan to do a spot of gerrymandering"
If things stand as they are then I for one, a strong supporter of AV, will have to reluctantly be involved in the campaign to keep the First Past the Post system, as will others, but the coalition, if they are genuine about change for the better and not change simply to keep the Conservatives in power ought to tackle the following concern head on.
"That there will be an independent commission, or at least one with equal members from government and opposition, that will look into the proposed boundary changes and make recommendations that will not cause any unfair balance of power"
If that is taken seriously by the coalition and they are able to reassure the Labour Party then I will happily campaign for AV. It should be borne in mind however that the boundary changes are proposed in a Bill later on.
I doubt it would lead immediately to PR (which I oppose) as the Conservatives won't tolerate that, and I also recognise that some Trade Unions and Labour MPs are against AV whatever and were not happy with the original Commons vote some months ago. But there are good arguments for AV, there are keen supporters from all the main political parties and there should be no impediment to giving the electorate a choice that may well re-engage an interest in the political process that has strong arguments and defenders on both sides. If we cannot hold the coalition to account properly on the boundary changes whilst at the same time seeing the merits of AV, we will look petty and spiteful. If however we are able to hold the coalition to account on this we will be able to show that the coalition are not taking the issue seriously and are merely using it as a vehicle to stay in power.
Labels: AV, Coalition, Electoral reform